Archives for category: Polly (2014)

When it appeared in 1977, my first novel was welcomed with considerable praise from The New York Times, Kirkus Reviews, The Los Angeles Times, Rolling Stone, Newsday, and many others.  The American Library Association named HARD FEELINGS a Best Book of the Year for Young Adults.  Partly on that account, the novel was purchased by high school librarians from Bangor to San Diego. 

The book ran into trouble in those communities (like my own here in northern Vermont), where some parents raised objection to the frank, if humorous, treatment of adolescent sexuality and the exuberant proclivity among some teenagers for the use of profanity.  HARD FEELINGS weathered those local tempests well for the most part, although the novel is still on some banned book lists here and there.

With the release of POLLY AND THE ONE AND ONLY WORLD just weeks away, my publisher, Green Writers Press, and I anticipate the likelihood of similar challenges, though this time for different reasons.  The story is set in a much-diminished America called the Christian Protectorates. The new government, formed in the wake of devastating cataclysms that are not explained, is a stifling theocracy. The story’s villains, then, are fundamentalists afflicted by the delusions that may often be inspired by biblical history and mythology.  Involuntary servitude is legal, for example, while public libraries are not.

At the start of the novel, the Faith and Redemption Amendment has just become law.  By its mandate “all the heretics, apostates, and followers of false creeds anywhere in the Protectorates had 90 days to register for assignment to a ReBirthing facility or apply for bondservant status. Anyone who failed to comply with the FRA, citizen or outlier, would face arrest and exile, consignment to a work camp, or death.”  Polly, a witch by blood and practice, must either hide or seek safety in exile–or else face certain arrest and likely execution.  Needless to say, some readers are bound to be offended by the depiction of Christians as hateful oppressors—and also of witches as heroic figures.  So, if the book gets attention, I’m afraid we’re bound to meet with calls for banning, particularly in the schools. 

Which raises the question posed a few days ago in the Atlantic:  Who Should Decide What High School Kids Are Allowed to Read?  It’s a question worth pondering.

When I began writing POLLY some seven years ago, my hazy vision of the future world it would depict was informed by increasingly insistent social, political, and climatological trends.  But I had not heard of “cli-fi.”  I hadn’t heard of cli-fi until a few months ago, in fact.  The new genre has caught on, it’s clear.  With worldwide recognition of the phenomenon of a fast-changing climate, a new thematic focus in fiction has emerged: the futuristic depiction of those changes and their disruptive, if not catastrophic, consequences.

Will this kind of new attention make a difference in cultural attitudes and public policy? I think it will, particularly for younger readers–by stirring their imaginations with visions of grim outcomes whose possible beginnings are apparent today, in the nurturing world we know.  A debate last month in the New York Times presents a variety of views on the topic.